Submissions

Editoriale

Articoli di ricerca

This section welcomes academic contributions dedicated to the theoretical and empirical analysis of Debate. The articles explore fundamental concepts, competence frameworks, methodological approaches, and interdisciplinary perspectives, offering both critical reflections on the nature of Debate and empirical analyses aimed at assessing its effectiveness and impact within educational and social contexts.

The goal is to provide an updated, rigorous, and thought-provoking framework for scholars, educators, and practitioners interested in understanding, developing, and applying Debate as a tool for education, research, and social transformation.

Submission requirements:

• Abstract: Maximum 150 words, including title and 3–5 keywords.

• Length: Between 25,000 and 35,000 characters (including spaces), excluding abstract, references, tables, charts, and figures.

• All submissions will undergo a peer review process prior to publication.
  Journal sections include:

• Research Articles

• Practical Experiences

• Translations

• Reviews

• Testimonials

Esperienze pratiche

This section gathers contributions dedicated to the practice of Debate in educational, academic, and professional contexts. Articles may include:

• Case studies: Detailed analyses of specific Debate experiences, describing the context and implementation methods, without necessarily presenting conclusive results.

• Project reports: Descriptions and reflections on concrete initiatives that use Debate to develop transversal skills, critical thinking, and active participation.

• Innovative practices: Presentations of experimental or original approaches to Debate, focusing on the tools, technologies, or methodological frameworks adopted.
  Submission requirements:

• Abstract: Maximum 150 words, including title and 3–5 keywords.

• Article length: Between 15,000 and 25,000 characters (including spaces), excluding abstract, references, tables, charts, and figures.
  This section aims to provide practical insights and meaningful reflections for the implementation of Debate, highlighting its value as an instrument for critical growth, active participation, and dialogue across different contexts.

Traduzioni

This section is devoted to the presentation of translations of texts relevant to the study and practice of Debate. It includes articles, essays, and international contributions by leading authors, made accessible to an Italian readership in order to enrich the theoretical and methodological landscape.

Translations are accompanied by critical introductions that situate the texts within current academic and educational debates, highlighting their importance and relevance to the themes addressed by the journal.

Submission requirements:
Translations must faithfully respect the length and structure of the original text.
A release or permission from the author or publisher for translation is required if the text is not in the public domain or explicitly available for translation and publication.

Each proposal must include:

• Original title and author of the translated text.

• A brief critical introduction (between 4,000 and 7,000 characters including spaces) providing:

  • The historical and theoretical context of the text.

  • Its relevance for the study of Debate.

  • Potential applications in educational and professional settings.

The proposal must be accompanied, where necessary, by explanatory notes to clarify terms and cultural or theoretical references present in the translated text.

This section aims to offer broader access to key texts, fostering the international circulation of knowledge and contributing to the development of a solid and up‑to‑date theoretical foundation for scholars, educators, and Debate practitioners.

Recensioni

This section is devoted to the critical analysis of books, articles, and educational materials relevant to the fields of Debate and argumentation. The reviews offer an in-depth assessment of the works, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and relevance for the academic and educational community. The aim is to provide useful guidance for those wishing to deepen their theoretical and practical knowledge in the field of Debate.

Review requirements:
Length: between 8,000 and 15,000 characters, including spaces.
Abstract: not required.
References: maximum of 10.

Each review must include:

• Title of the work reviewed.

• Author of the work reviewed.

• ISBN of the work.

• Publisher of the work reviewed.

• Price of the work (where available).

Reviews must be critical and well-argued, offering reflections and clear evaluations of the importance of the work for research, teaching, and the practice of Debate.

Testimonianze

This section welcomes first-hand accounts from those who, in various roles, take part in and contribute to the world of Debate. Contributions may relate to experiences of debaters, coaches, trainers, organizers, judges, and other figures involved in the practice and dissemination of Debate.

These pieces offer a personal and reflective perspective on concrete experiences, challenges faced, achievements attained, and lessons learned. The aim is to build a collective narrative that highlights the practical, human, and professional dimensions of Debate, shedding light on its educational, social, and organizational impact.

Requirements for testimonials:
Length: between 8,000 and 15,000 characters, including spaces.
Abstract: not required.
The text must be clear, well structured, and, where necessary, accompanied by specific references to particular experiences (events, projects, competitions, training activities, etc.).
Explanatory notes may be included to provide context or technical details.

Testimonials constitute a space for sharing and reflection, offering concrete insights and inspiration to those who practise, study, or organize activities related to Debate.